Think like a Catholic…

There is a particular modern personality type—you’ve met him—who has read half of a podcast transcript about Nietzsche, owns a yoga mat, and informs you, with great solemnity:

I’m spiritual, not religious. I just try to be a good person.

Which is impressive, because he cannot define:

  • what a person is

  • what “good” means

  • or why any of it matters

But he is trying, and that is what counts. And, don’t worry. We have moved beyond the rigid, oppressive clarity of two thousand years of Catholic thought. We now have TikTok Philosophers in Fedoras, Apoplectic Angry Atheists and Great Theologians like James Talarico declaring God as “non-binary”. More on him later…

Meanwhile, the Catholic Church—apparently the villain in this story—has spent two thousand years calmly insisting:

Things exist.
They can be known.
And you are not free to mutilate reality because you feel like it.

This, naturally, is considered extreme.

Let’s walk through how we got from Christ establishing a Church to Pastor Chad hosting a sermon series called “Be Your Best You.”

I. When Reality Took Flesh

Before Aristotle, before Aquinas, before the Enlightenment discovered feelings, something happened that permanently ruined every modern attempt to escape reality:

God became man.

Not a metaphor. Not a symbol. Not “my truth.”

A real man. In history.

“The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”¹

Which immediately creates problems for modern thinkers, because if God enters reality:

  • reality matters

  • truth is objective

  • the body is not optional

This is the Incarnation—the moment when metaphysics stops being abstract and starts walking around.

The Passion: Reality Is Not Therapeutic

Then Christ is crucified.

Not as a metaphor for “healing your inner child,” but as a brutal execution. Want a good depiction?

Watch “The Passion of the Christ”.

Netflix

Amazon Prime

Apple TV

Daily Wire

The event tells us:

  • evil is real

  • sin is real

  • man is not naturally fine

This is deeply offensive to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who insists that man is naturally good and just needs better social structures.

Christ did not die because of zoning laws. He died because man is fallen.

The Resurrection: Nietzsche Loses Before He Arrives

Then Christ rises—bodily.

Which is a problem for:

  • materialists (who deny anything beyond matter)

  • nihilists (who deny meaning entirely)

Because the Resurrection declares:

Reality is meaningful. Truth is real. Death is not final.

Centuries later, Friedrich Nietzsche will announce that God is dead.

Christ had already handled that.

The Church: Authority Exists (Sorry, Pastor Chad)

And then Christ does something completely unacceptable to modern sensibilities:

He establishes a Church.

Not a book. Not a discussion group. A Church.

“You are Peter… I will give you the keys…”²

Keys mean authority.

Which means:

  • truth is not crowdsourced

  • doctrine is not negotiable

  • Pastor Chad does not get to redesign Christianity because he read a blog post

Then:

“Go and teach all nations…”³

Not:

“Go and facilitate open-ended dialogue.”

Teach.

With authority.

Enter Aristotle and Aquinas (The Last Adults in the Room)

Even before Christ, Aristotle had already noticed:

Things are what they are.⁴

Which is controversial today, but was once considered quite obvious.

Then came Thomas Aquinas, who unites:

  • Aristotle’s realism

  • Christian revelation

  • actual logic

And produces a system where:

  • Being — things exist and have natures

  • Truth — the mind conforms to reality

  • The Good — actions perfect a thing according to its nature⁵

In other words: a complete, coherent, unified account of reality.

Which is precisely why modern philosophy spends the next 500 years trying to escape it.

II. The First “I Know Better” (Cue Martin Luther)

Man has a unique ability to repeatedly adopt the declaration of Lucifer—”non-serviam”—i.e., “I will not serve”. And yet, in every instance, he truly believes he’s inventing a new TikTok trend.

This impulse shows up everywhere, but it got a major institutional upgrade with Martin Luther, who essentially said:

“What if the Church is wrong and I’m right?”

Which was just a reinvented version of:

“Yes, a snake offered this to my wife, but the apple was tasty!”

or, in today’s parlance:

I’ve done my own research.

Once you elevate private judgment above received truth, you have planted the seed for everything that follows:

  • my interpretation

  • my truth

  • my identity

  • my lived experience

And eventually:

“My truth says gravity is oppressive and my truth says I can fly”

Then you splatter on the ground after jumping off the building.

Reality will always offer clarity.

III. Descartes: The Man Who Discovered Himself

Now that authority is weakened, along comes René Descartes, who decides to doubt everything.

After dismantling reality, he triumphantly concludes:

“I think, therefore I am.”⁶

Which is like unplugging your house and announcing you’ve discovered electricity.

But the shift is critical:

  • Truth no longer begins with being

  • It begins with the self

Reality is now something to be reconstructed—if we feel like it.

IV. Hume: Reality, But Optional

Then comes David Hume, who looks at the situation and says:

“You don’t really know anything.”⁷

  • causation? unclear

  • substance? questionable

  • morality? meh.

Also:

You can’t get an “ought” from an “is.”

Which is convenient if you’d like to avoid moral responsibility entirely.

The Catholic response:

If you deny what things are, then yes—you can’t derive what you ought to do.

This is not a discovery. It is self-inflicted confusion.

See the building jumper above.

V. Kant: Duty Without a Foundation

Enter Immanuel Kant, who attempts to rescue morality.

His solution:

  • ignore what things are

  • enforce rules

Act according to universalizable maxims⁸

Which sounds impressive until you realize it never answers:

What is a human being?

Without that, morality floats in abstraction.

You can follow the rule perfectly and still misunderstand reality completely.

VI. Bentham: Morality Goes Corporate

Then comes Jeremy Bentham, who reduces morality to:

Pleasure vs. pain⁹

Now:

  • humans = data points

  • ethics = calculation

  • dignity = negotiable

If sacrificing a few increases overall happiness?

Congratulations—it’s ethical.

Just don’t call it what it is—ghoulish.

VII. Hegel and Marx: Reality Becomes Political

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel tells us:

Reality evolves. Truth evolves. Everything evolves.¹⁰

Then Karl Marx removes the metaphysics entirely:

  • truth → ideology

  • morality → class struggle

  • man → economic unit¹¹

This ends exactly how you’d expect with hundreds of millions in graves…

VIII. Rousseau, Feelings, and Pastor Chad’s Theology Degree

Jean-Jacques Rousseau says:

Follow your feelings¹²

Pastor Chad hears:

“Rewrite Christianity around self-expression.”

Now we have:

  • sermons about self-esteem

  • theology based on emotions

  • and liturgy that feels like a coffee shop

Reality is now subordinate to feelings.

IX. Nietzsche: At Least Someone Admits It

Finally, Friedrich Nietzsche arrives and says:

“Nothing matters.”¹³

Which is the logical conclusion of everything before him.

Once:

  • being is denied

  • truth is unstable

  • the good is invented

All that remains is:

Power.

X. Catholic Alternative

While the modern world experiments with every possible way of avoiding reality, the Catholic tradition continues to insist:

  • things are what they are

  • they can be known

  • they have a purpose

And from this flows a moral system based on virtue, not:

  • rules detached from nature (Kant)

  • or pleasure metrics (Bentham)

A man becomes good by:

  • aligning himself with reality

  • disciplining his intellect

  • ordering his desires

Not by:

  • redefining truth

  • optimizing happiness

  • or posting about it online

XI. A Final Thought

Modern philosophy tried everything:

  • doubt (Descartes)

  • skepticism (Hume)

  • duty (Kant)

  • calculation (Bentham)

  • evolution of truth (Hegel)

  • materialism (Marx)

  • feelings (Rousseau)

  • nihilism (Nietzsche)

And after all that, we have a culture that cannot answer basic questions about reality—but is extremely confident while being wrong.

Meanwhile, the Catholic Church continues:

Begin with what is.
Know it as it is.
Live in accordance with it.

Which, despite 500 years of philosophical improvisation, remains undefeated.

Endnotes

  1. John 1:14

  2. Matthew 16:18–19

  3. Matthew 28:19–20

  4. Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book IV

  5. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, I, q. 3–11; I-II, q. 94

  6. René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy

  7. David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature

  8. Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

  9. Jeremy Bentham, Principles of Morals and Legislation

  10. G.W.F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit

  11. Karl Marx, Theses on Feuerbach

  12. Rousseau, Discourse on Inequality

  13. Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

A.C. Sarcasticus

Antonius Catechesis Sarcasticus is a Catholic layman, amateur medievalist, and full-time disappointment to modernists everywhere. He was catechized before he was caffeinated and learned early that most modern arguments collapse under the gentle pressure of definitions and reality

Educated primarily by the Church Fathers, the Councils, and whatever book Protestantism forgot to footnote, he spends his time reading heresies so you don’t have to and responding with a combination of Latin, logic, and barely concealed amusement and disgust.

Routinely accused of being “uncharitable,” “rigid,” and “surprisingly well-read for someone online,” he pleads guilty only to the third. When not writing satirical essays dismantling atheism, agnosticism, felt banners and ecclesial vibes-based theology, he can be found drinking strong coffee, rereading Aquinas, and waiting patiently for arguments that have not already been answered in the fourth century. His hobbies include mocking the modern world, critiquing progressivism in all its forms and eating donuts.

He writes contra mundum, not because it is trendy, but because it is usually necessary.

Previous
Previous

LITURGICAL STUDY — PASSION SUNDAY - Usus Antiquior (1962 Missal)

Next
Next

LITURGICAL STUDY — PASSION SUNDAY -Novus Ordo — YEAR A - 3/22/2026